While in Egypt editions on 826/7 pages were replaced by reduced page editions (except some tafāsīr), Bairut, Dimašq, ʿAmmān, Doha and Kuwait printed almost hundred editions, mostly in one volume, some in 30 parts.
While die KFA until the end reproduced both the Publication details of 1924 and 1952, the ʿAmmān edition that survives in archive.org has three colophons:
I am unhappy with the pagination in the Bairut, Damascus, ʿAmmān, and Doha editions, which dispense with the Amīrīya's separate pagination for the non‑Qurʾānic material, i.e. running the numbering straight through to 852 or 855 respectively — the Šāmī editions including seven pages on the differences from 1924 (as in KFA II), the Qatari one having four pages of duʿāʾ al-ḫātima instead. In doing so, however, all these continuously paginated editions commit a pagination malpractice: they do not count the blank page between the Qurʾānic text and the appendices, so although in the Qurʾānic section all even‑numbered pages are on the right, the appendices have odd‑numbered pages on the right‑hand side.
–
Showing posts with label reprints. Show all posts
Showing posts with label reprints. Show all posts
Wednesday, 6 May 2026
Šarikat al-ʾiʿālānāt aš-šarqīya 1382/1961
With the next edition we have a problem. As I see it, they good thick paper but bound it cheaply. So most surviving copies have been rebound (i guess early by a careful owner, who knew that the small kfe is useless)
Wednesday, 12 November 2025
Nairīzī
Mirza Aḥmad an-Nairīzī (ca. 1650–1747) is the last of the classical Iranian calligrahers. Informations are hard to find, because often under Neyrizi or Nayrizi.
(the last image shows on the right: part of a page (start of Surat an-Nisāʾ) from the splendid reprint offered to important guests of the Islamic Republic.
(note that the "typesetter" on the right made a typical Persian mistake: he typed "space" after /wa-/und – may he'll find forgiveness)
–
unlike the reprints above the images below are from Merkaz Ṭab-o-Našr in their reformed spelling:
on the right: the letters in light brown are not pronounced "as such": either not at all or not as ī, but ā, not as ū, but u ...(note that the "typesetter" on the right made a typical Persian mistake: he typed "space" after /wa-/und – may he'll find forgiveness)
–
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Lucknow 1890
The first images of a muṣḥaf by Naval Kishore came from Oxford: black and white, wrong order and low resolution. It made be happy. Now I f...
-
40 years ago Adrian Alan Brockett submitted his Ph.D. to the University of St.Andrews: Studies in Two Transmissions of the Qurʾān . Now...
-
Although it is often written that the King Fuʾād Edition fixed a somehow unclear text, and established the reading of Ḥafṣ according to ʿĀ...
-
from a German blog coPilot made this English one Iranian Qur'an Orthography: Editorial Principles and Variants The Iranian مرکز...















