Showing posts with label ʿuṯmānic rasm. Show all posts
Showing posts with label ʿuṯmānic rasm. Show all posts
Thursday, 30 May 2024
Wednesday, 22 December 2021
LXXI ‒ Marijn van Putten
On the basis of some of the oldest manuscripts Marijn van Putten publishes
a muṣḥaf that comes as close as possible to the ʿUṯmānic rasm ‒
not to be confused with the «ʿUṯmānic rasm», that is 300 years younger: deviced by
ad-Dānī.
I compare it with the common Maġribian/Andalusian/Egyptian rasm (in an edition from Brunai) and the Indian one (in edition with 848 pages with 13 lines written by Ḫalīq (al-)Asadī):
Now, that you have seen what "good" editions have made out of the old text, here the same from two "bad" editions: Ottoman from 300 years ago (next to the old text), and Turkish from this century: I prefer the "Indian" editions, but even Turkish (and Persian) editions are fine.
I compare it with the common Maġribian/Andalusian/Egyptian rasm (in an edition from Brunai) and the Indian one (in edition with 848 pages with 13 lines written by Ḫalīq (al-)Asadī):
Now, that you have seen what "good" editions have made out of the old text, here the same from two "bad" editions: Ottoman from 300 years ago (next to the old text), and Turkish from this century: I prefer the "Indian" editions, but even Turkish (and Persian) editions are fine.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
mistake made, mistake copied
In 1924 the King Fuʾād Edition misplaced both hamza signs and mutating small alifs (daggers) after the yāʾ-tooth something that was not don...
-
40 years ago Adrian Alan Brockett submitted his Ph.D. to the University of St.Andrews: Studies in Two Transmissions of the Qurʾān . Now...
-
There are many false assertions about the King Fuʾād Edition: that it is type printed ‒ it is type set, but offset printed that it ...
-
It is common knowledge that the King Fuʾād Edition of the Ḥafṣ qirāʾa was an immediate success in the Muslim world. Common knowledge, but...



