I reply:
yes, but raḥmān is also with short a and ḏālika too.
If there is no long /ā/ sign in the whole codex,
then you don't need one in ʾaḷḷāh.
But in the Giza Qur'an there is Long-ā (fatḥa + dagger-alif) everywhere where needed!
As explained in "Kein Standard" Bergsträßer and experts have overlooked that
the 1924 orthography is not an invention, but just copied from a Warš muṣḥaf:
And just as these do not spell ʾaḷḷāh correctly
but incorrectly,
so does G24 and since 1990 all Arabs (esp. Madina).
At least, they write ʾallah all the time:
instead of ʾaḷḷāh:
the Nizām of Hyderabad had it corrected (1938, reprinted by the Islamic Call Society 1976f.):
but not in allahumma (nowhere, and in none of the bilingual editions ‒ cf. first line)
Two examples from Dalīl al-Ḫairāt, one from Mali without long /ā/, one from the Ottoman Empire with long /ā/: