On the basis of some of the oldest manuscripts Marijn van Putten publishes
a muṣḥaf that comes as close as possible to the ʿUṯmānic rasm ‒
not to be confused with the «ʿUṯmānic rasm», that is 300 years younger: deviced by
ad-Dānī.
I compare it with the common Maġribian/Andalusian/Egyptian rasm (in an edition from Brunai)
and the Indian one (in edition with 848 pages with 13 lines written by Ḫalīq (al-)Asadī):
Now, that you have seen what "good" editions have made out of the old text, here the same from two "bad" editions: Ottoman from 300 years ago (next to the old text), and Turkish from this century:
I prefer the "Indian" editions, but even Turkish (and Persian) editions are fine.
Showing posts with label critical edition. Show all posts
Showing posts with label critical edition. Show all posts
Wednesday, 22 December 2021
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
mistake made, mistake copied
In 1924 the King Fuʾād Edition misplaced both hamza signs and mutating small alifs (daggers) after the yāʾ-tooth something that was not don...
-
40 years ago Adrian Alan Brockett submitted his Ph.D. to the University of St.Andrews: Studies in Two Transmissions of the Qurʾān . Now...
-
There are many false assertions about the King Fuʾād Edition: that it is type printed ‒ it is type set, but offset printed that it ...
-
It is common knowledge that the King Fuʾād Edition of the Ḥafṣ qirāʾa was an immediate success in the Muslim world. Common knowledge, but...