numbers after each verse

I tend to think: marking the end of verses is important,
not putting a number each time,
because the end-of-verse-sign imply the numbers.

I admit: there are two things that make is complicated
In Muṣḥaf al-Muḫallalātī the end-of-verse of all seven canonical systems are indicated, so the numbers are not that easily countable, but they are there.
In some maṣāḥif the same sign is use of end-of-verse and for an obligatory stop within a verse,
the "fake" ends not being counted in the number-of-verses given in the sura-title-box ‒ someting clear only to the experts.

Muhammad Hozien has (for the time being) established the first printed muṣḥaf with numbers after each verse: Istanbul 1298/1881

But
I still do not see the big difference to Hafez Osman, the Elder putting an ع at the end of each tenth verse and an عشر at the margin:

or Muḥammad Amīn Rušdī using the abjad ten: ے

above the last word of the tenth, twentieth, thirdith ... verse there is a ے
In the manuscript there were no numbers; they were added 1370/1951 for the ʿIrāqī State print.































‒ ­